Tuesday, March 25, 2008

Dirty "Cleaning"

Everyone likes to keep themselves and their houses clean, right? Laundry detergent, dishwashing detergent, deodorizers, disinfectants, toilet bowl cleaners, glass cleaners, furniture polish, all-purpose cleaners... the list goes on. Unfortunately, all mainstream versions of these products do more to make our world (and our health) dirty, than clean. They are toxic to people and to the environment.

Most commercially available cleaning products contain materials that are considered hazardous waste by the U.S. government. Hazardous waste use normally requires a license and some means of proper disposal, but use in households across our nation goes on unchecked, polluting our water supply, our air, and our bodies. Laundry detergent, for example, contains a chemical so toxic that it can be used as a pesticide. What's worse, the worst, most toxic chemicals may not be on the label-- the government protects the companies from revealing their "trade secrets." But that's only an issue if you bother to read the label- and can understand what each ingredient means and does! My guess is that most people (myself included) have been filling their houses with toxic chemicals with no idea what's in them.

One major concern is cancer. Before the industrial revolution, 1 in 8,000 people had cancer. Today that number is 1 in 3. We still don't know for sure which materials can cause cancer, but we have some idea. According to the EPA, toxic fumes released into our air due to cleaning products are three times more likely to cause cancer than other air pollutants. Air inside American houses is an average of two to five times (and can be up to 100 times) more polluted than the air outside, mostly the result of mainstream cleaning products- that means by simply breathing inside our homes, we're increasing our risk of cancer. Largely because of this, housewives have a 55% higher rate of cancer than women who work outside the home- and all thanks to chemicals we've used to keep ourselves "clean" and "healthy"!

Aside from containing probable carcinogens, known side effects of mainstream cleaning products are central nervous system damage, headaches, confusion, symptoms of mental illness, joint pain, chronic fatigue, birth defects, kidney and liver poisoning (sometimes damaging enough to cause death), allergic reactions, respiratory tract irritation and distress, and death for asthmatics. In Washington State, for example, 6% of janitors suffered injuries from cleaning products that were so bad they had to miss work. 10% of poison control calls deal with injuries due to cleaning products- mainly from children under six. Many chemicals in cleaning products can be stored in fatty tissues and passed on through mother's milk. Here is a full list of health and environmental effects of mainstream cleaning products.

And they do get into our environment, with staggering consequences. As of 2002, two thirds of our streams contained damaging pollutants from cleaning products. Chlorinated materials can form other compounds, like DDT, which are stored in fatty tissues of organisms, take a long time to be broken down, and are passed up the food chain in increasingly higher concentrations. Petroleum-based products (toilet cleaner, detergent, glass cleaner, etc) use non-renewable resources which cause impurities in our water supply. EDTA, a chemical found in all-purpose cleaners, binds to heavy metals in lakes, activating the metals.

Phosphates are one of the worst culprits in mainstream cleaning product pollution. They are ingredients in mainstream laundry detergent as well as a variety of cleaning products. They cause "algae blooms" which suffocate surrounding wildlife, killing off fish and shellfish populations, turning bodies of water the color of pea soup, and causing giant "dead zones" in which only the most primitive bacteria and algae can survive. From an anthropocentric perspective, they hurt local economies by eliminating incomes related to tourism, fishing, and shellfish sales. Phosphates are so dangerous that eleven states have banned them. This is great news for the environment, but most of the country still allows the use of this highly damaging ingredient! Here is more information on phosphates and other effects of mainstream cleaning products.

The moral of the story, folks, is that pretty much all mainstream cleaning products contain at least one ingredient which is considered hazardous waste. If you're not willing to contain this ingredient after use for disposal at a hazardous waste facility, you should probably be using something else to clean your toilet, windows, countertops, clothes, and dishes.

So what can we do?

As my Dad always taught me about capitalism, we can vote with our feet. Here is a list of biodegradable, environmentally safe cleaning products. Of course, this works best if you contact the companies whose brands you used to buy, and let them know why you're leaving. The good news is, many people are already doing this! The natural household cleaning market is growing by 18-25% each year. This is still only one percent of the total cleaning market, but it's progress!

We can contact our elected officials and ask them to support a ban on phosphate use, as eleven states have already done. We can also request that the government itself switch to use natural cleaning products. The city of Santa Monica did this in 1994, in 15 of 17 cleaning product categories, eliminating the purchase of 1.5 tons of hazardous waste per year, and saving itself 5% of its previous cleaning budget to boot!

We can urge our places of employment to switch to environmentally friendly cleaning products, especially by pointing out the savings Santa Monica's city government experienced when it did so.

We can tell our friends. There are some very simple cleaning solutions which involve environmentally safe products you and your friends probably have lying around your houses anyway. The Worldwatch site on cleaning products, which has been helpful throughout this post, contains some excellent and easy ideas for "greening" your cleaning routine. (It's at the bottom, titled "Simple Things You Can Do.")

Good luck!

8 comments:

ScottAU said...

WOW- "Before the industrial revolution, 1 in 8,000 people had cancer. Today that number is 1 in 3."

I haven't heard that statistic before. It isn't a shocking occurrence, but a shocking number. It says it all. It seems like a government mandate that these laundry detergents, cleaning sprays, etc... be marked TOXIC would make sense. In the mean time, let's drive up the market for Method and other natural cleaners.

Lauren B said...

I just want to plug the brand "seventh generation." I use their products and LOVE them. I know Whole foods carries them and so does Safeway (but Giant does not, at least not yet). They also make more enviro-friendly paper products.

J. Kaushansky said...

The 1 in 8,000 vs. 1 in 3 statistic seems a little too outlandish. Would you mind citing the study you found it in?

And remember your PC language. No one is a housewife anymore, they're "homemakers."

*chuckle*

Katya said...

@ Polar Kodiak: "According to the American Cancer Society, prior to the 20th century, only 1 out of 8,000 people in the United States were stricken with cancer. Since the Industrial Revolution the introduction into our lives of a myriad of chemicals, the incidence of cancer has increased to a startling 1 out of 3 people."

This via the website I linked to as "a full list" of environmental and health effects of cleaning products: http://www.vanessasgift.com/articles.htm

I've written an email to the maintainer of this site, asking where she found this. I also looked up cancer incidence on the American Cancer Society's website, and found that current rates average about 1 in 25 people, and even among African American men, who have the highest incidence, rates were only about 1 in 15. I was unable to find any statistics about US cancer incidence before the 20th Century.

If the person in charge of the "Vanessa's gift" site gets back to me, I'll let you know what she said.

*Please note: most of my information on this post came from the Worldwatch website and the ShareGuide Holistic Health magazine, so most of it should still be accurate.

Anonymous said...

My mom is currently back on hospice care with kidney cancer which is a form of "environmental cancer". She was a potter and had a studio, a gardener, was a smoker for 30 years (quit when she turned 50) She is now 76. We kept grilling the Doc about what caused it. He said no to all the things she would have been exposed to in her hobbies even included her smoking. He stated its from contact with a combination of things over an extended period of time like glass and window cleaners, toilet and shower cleaners, oven cleaners, carpet shampoos and upholstery waterproofing, car exhaust, chemicals in building supplies like carpets and composit flooring etc maybe even the hair dyes and setting lotions from her once a week hair appointment for the last 40 years. *shrug*

I had already started a life of removing those chemicals from my home. I had done some early on in my life to save money when i had my 1st child but i got down and dirty about it around 8 years ago. I was using febreeze one day about 8 years ago and my bird fell over dead with in a few min of spraying the room. I started following what Bird owners use to clean homes with since parrots etc are so sensitive. When i spoke to some bird people about it they where like OMG no! dont ever use that kind of stuff around birds!

I guess for me it has come full circle now with my moms illness. A real eye opener. If it's not safe for Avians, it probably isnt safe for us.

Anonymous said...

Even if the statistics are not quite accurate, the sentiment is true. Mainstream cleaners are horrible for health and the environment. The EPA has a design for the environment label they put on products certifying they are environmentally friendly. (However the program is voluntary.) Also, Clorox just came out with a "Green Works" line that is environmentally friendly, cheap and in wide distribution so now people don't have an excuse when it comes to buying cleaning products. They partnered with the Sierra Club and have a DfE label, so you know it's a legit.

Also, Katya, I still trust the veracity of your posts even if the numbers in this post were a bit skewed. I know you wouldn't purposely lead us astray.

Anonymous said...

This is why I use only Melaleuca cleaning products (melaleuca.com). They are all environmentally friendly and non-toxic for your family. Better yet, they are economical. I've been using them for over 5 years now. I've gotten free samples for mainstream laundry detergent and stuff, but I just throw them out. I love the laundry detergent, the dishwasher detergent, and all the rest.

The thing about Melaleuca is that they are solely a direct marketing company. You can't just swing by the website and place an order. If you would like to become a customer, you can email me at twilightsun at mail dot com. Just put "Melaleuca" in the subject line. It does cost $25 to become a customer. If you don't want to make that commitment straight out, I can place an order for you with my account - email me at the same address.

You can browse their online store without becoming a customer. You can also check out their line of health supplements, personal care products, and cosmetics.

Nicluc said...

Great article. Can youplease tell me your source for the statement that stay-at-home women have a 55% increase in cancer than women who work? Thanks.

Nicluc